2025

APPEALS

  1. Only athletes can submit appeals to the administration.
  2. Athlete can only appeal their own score and performance.
  3. Appeals will only be accepted via the appeals form on this page.
  4. It is not possible to appeal a no-rep call. A call made on the field stays on the field. Only issues of a technical nature can be appealed.

    Examples of issues that can be appealed:
    • Scorecard or leaderboard data inconsistency or error.
    • Counting inconsistencies or error (e.g., the total number of repetitions completed was incorrect).
    • Loading inconsistency or error.
    • Course markings or directional travel inconsistencies or error.
    • Equipment or monitor failure that was not the responsibility of the athlete.
    • Event movement or order miscommunication or action by judge.
    • Action of another athlete or person which impeded the athlete’s progress.

    Examples of issues that cannot be appealed:

    • Live judgment calls and “no reps” by the judge.

  5. Each athlete can only submit an appeal two (2) times. This number does not include appeals that are approved.
  6. When an appeal has been submitted, it is handled by a designated Appeals Officer (AO) that will initiate an investigation in the matter. This could include discussions with the Event Manager, Competition Manager, Head Judge or anyone else that could contribute with information. It could also include the request for evidence such as videos. When the investigation is concluded, a decision will be taken by the AO and the Competition Manager and communicated to the appealing athlete via email. The decision will also be published on the website. If a score needs to be adjusted, the AO will handle this with the scoring office.

Note. The Competition management has the exclusive right to adjust scores without an appeal being submitted if they find it necessary.

APPEALS SUBMISSION FORM

Describe what happened as detailed as possible and what your request is (change of score, etc). Include links to videos or photos that you think will help us in our decision or name and contact info to someone that can verify.

Submitted appeals

Name
Veronique Antens
Division
Masters Women 40-44
Workout
24.1
Decision
Approved
Comment
Leaderboard says time was 9:42, but scorecard signed by judge and athlete clearly states 9:41. Score is adjusted to 9:41.
Name
Helen Nutter
Division
RX Women
Workout
24.4
Decision
Denied
Comment
Athlete was claiming one of her ropeclimbs was a good rep. According to the rulebook, no-reps cannot be overturned. Therefore the appeal was denied and the result stays.
Name
Nika Maisuradze
Division
RX Men
Workout
24.4
Decision
Denied
Comment
Athlete claimed the markings on the ropes were not according to standard, but failed to explain what action he wants as a result of the appeal and failed to provide evidence. Therefore the appeal has been denied.
Name
Ysabel Otte
Division
Masters Women 35-39
Workout
24.3
Decision
Denied
Comment
Athlete claims she did 164 reps (2 rnds + 30 GHD + 14 C2B). However, 10m handstand walk only counts as 2 reps since they must be performed unbroken in sections of 5m, therefore the score of 148 is correct and the appeal is denied.
Name
Andreas Loidl
Division
Masters Men 40-44
Workout
24.3
Decision
Denied
Comment
Athlete claims his score of 142 reps is not correct. However, 10m handstand walk only counts as 2 reps since they must be performed unbroken in sections of 5m, therefore the score of 142 (3 rnds + 16 GHD) is correct and the appeal is denied.

Get ready for

2025

QUALIFIERS: May 29 - June 23

FINALS: Oct 31 - Nov 2

Thank you!

Our Appeals Officer will take care of your appeal and get back to you with further questions or a decision.